John Lewis | Print |  E-mail

John Lewis

Download John Lewis's submission (pdf)

Responded to survey: no

MSI involvement: no [what's this?]

Grade 2: Acknowledges that minimum and industry benchmark wages are not sufficient standards, but no real efforts to apply living wage. [what's this?]

Summary

No response received in 2008; apparently no activity on living wages

Position on living wages

John Lewis told us in 2006 that, “we recognise that our code sets an aspirational standard [on wages] and we are keen to work with our suppliers and other stakeholders to identify practical ways of implementing it in the future.”

Work so far on living wages

In 2006 John Lewis told us of some,“[p]reparatory work with local partners looking at wage levels” in India.

In 2007, it sent us a considerable amount of detail regarding this preparatory work, but in it made only a cursory reference to living wages. It appears therefore that the living wage remains aspirational for John Lewis.

Plans on living wages

No submission received

Other significant information

None

Our comments

John Lewis had a lot to say in previous years, but did not respond in 2008. We said in 2007 that, while it may be developing and improving an ethical trading programme, it hasn’t grasped the nature of our concerns and was throwing resources at an auditing model that is widely acknowledged to be failing.

Comments (0) >>
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


Last Updated ( Saturday, 27 September 2008 )
 

Supporters

Tearfund Women Working Worldwide The National Group on Homeworking Methodist Relief and Development Fund Community: The Union For Life HomeWorkers Worldwide War on Want Labour Behind the Label Ethical Consumer No Sweat