|
Workers still find themselves struggling to survive on the breadline, working excessive overtime just so they can make ends meet. |
| Zara | | Print | |
Page 2 of 3 Detail on workers' rightsWagesInditex's code only commits it to minimum wages, although as an ETI member it is committed to working towards a living wage.
Inditex's annual report measures performance only against minimum, not living, wages. Freedom of associationZara’s code states that,The External Manufacturers and Workshops shall respect the rights of the employees to associate or organise themselves or to bargain collectively, in no case shall employees be subjected to any kind of sanction because of this. Inditex’s recent case history is promising. It has been pro-active in attempting to help resolve a number of cases of trade union oppression, and its annual report sets out steps it is taking to facilitate access in Morocco and Bangladesh. In the latter case it says that following two breaches of trade union rights, it set up a working group with aims including,
The aims for these factories include training management and workers’ representatives by ‘external trade union agents’. Monitoring and verificationInditex's Annual Report indicates that in 2005 it audited 1060 of 1686 production sites. Of these, 339 were `rejected for breach'. Inditex follows the `BSCI' model of social auditing, singled out for criticism by campaigners because it was developed without collaboration with trade unions and labour rights groups, and its consequent `minimalist' approach. Our conclusionThere are a number of areas in which Inditex is performing well. For example, when a factory supplying Inditex in Bangladesh collapsed in 2005, killing 64 workers, it was one of the first to contribute to the relief effort, and has invited other brands to contribute to a relief fund. We still have significant concerns based on the information made public by Inditex, above all in regard to its auditing processes. |
|||||
| Last Updated ( Friday, 14 September 2007 ) | |||||